Recurly competitors: Alternatives to consider

Looking for the best alternatives to Recurly? Here's a breakdown of 12 leading Recurly competitors – each with verified G2 scores and a clear summary of what makes them a stronger fit than Recurly for modern finance teams.

Position Recurly competitors G2 score What makes this platform a strong Recurly alternative
1 ZoneBilling 4.4 Eliminates manual work and simplifies billing and revenue management by running natively in NetSuite – no middleware, no sync errors, full audit control.
2 Chargebee 4.4 Offers a broader feature set than Recurly – extending beyond core subscription management to support advanced revenue recognition and multiple integrations.
3 Maxio 4.3 Is purpose-built for B2B SaaS companies with advanced revenue recognition and metrics that Recurly can't match.
4 Zuora 3.9 Handles complex global billing scenarios that overwhelm Recurly's infrastructure.
5 Zoho Billing 4.3 Delivers affordable, integrated billing within the Zoho ecosystem – simpler setup than Recurly for smaller teams.
6 Sage Intacct 4.3 Combines full ERP capabilities with subscription billing – eliminating the need for Recurly as a separate system.
7 Paddle 4.5 Acts as merchant of record to handle global tax compliance – removing complexities Recurly pushes to users.
8 FastSpring 4.5 Specializes in digital product sales with built-in tax automation that Recurly requires third-party tools to match.
9 Salesforce Revenue Cloud 4.2 Unifies CPQ, billing and revenue recognition for enterprises already in Salesforce – deeper than Recurly's integration.
10 Stripe Billing 4.4 Offers developer-friendly APIs and instant global payments that make Recurly feel outdated.
11 Billsby 4.8 Delivers the highest user satisfaction with simple, affordable billing that takes hours to set up vs. weeks with Recurly.
12 SubscriptionFlow 4.6 Provides extensive customization and automation capabilities at a fraction of Recurly's cost.

What is Recurly?

Recurly is a recurring billing and subscription management platform designed for B2B and B2C businesses selling digital products and services. It automates billing cycles, payment collection, dunning management and basic revenue reporting through integrations with payment gateways and third-party accounting systems.

The platform supports multiple pricing plans and models – fixed subscriptions, usage-based billing, one-time charges and add-ons. But as billing complexity grows or businesses shift toward B2B models, many teams discover Recurly's limitations push them toward more robust subscription management platforms.

What does Recurly do?

Recurly automates recurring billing, manages subscription lifecycles and provides basic analytics for subscription businesses. It handles payment processing through gateways like Stripe and PayPal, automates failed payment retries and generates invoices for customers.

Yet finance teams evaluating Recurly competitors often find the platform falls short on enterprise requirements – like native ERP integration, complex revenue recognition or multi-entity consolidation. These gaps force manual workarounds that defeat the purpose of automation.

12 Recurly alternatives for businesses

These Recurly competitors each solve different aspects of the billing challenge. We've analyzed real user feedback, tested core functionality and interviewed finance teams to understand where each platform truly excels – and where it falls short.

1. ZoneBilling

ZoneBilling is the only billing solution that runs entirely within NetSuite as a native SuiteApp. Unlike Recurly's disconnected architecture requiring constant data syncs, ZoneBilling leverages your existing NetSuite records and workflows to automate complex billing scenarios while maintaining complete audit control.

Built for: NetSuite-based companies managing subscription, usage-based or project billing who need unified financial operations without the reconciliation burden of external billing platforms.

What makes ZoneBilling the best Recurly competitor?

  • Eliminates integration complexity by operating directly within your ERP – no disconnected systems, delayed syncs or manual reconciliation between billing and finance
  • Handles sophisticated billing models, including prepaid credits, tiered usage with rollover and mid-contract amendments
  • Automates ASC 606 and IFRS 15 revenue recognition using NetSuite ARM's native capabilities
  • Provides real-time financial reporting without waiting for data synchronization
  • Scales from startups to billion-dollar enterprises without performance degradation

ZoneBilling strengths:

  • Minimal ramp-up for NetSuite users – built natively with NetSuite's standard records, workflows and security roles
  • Reduces month-end close time by 80% through automated revenue recognition and unified reporting
  • Maintains complete audit trails and role-based controls inside NetSuite to support SOX-compliant processes

ZoneBilling pricing: Custom pricing based on transaction volume and complexity. Based on estimates from the ZoneBilling ROI calculator, a company billing 1,200 invoices per month with $70M in revenue could save ~$340K annually – a 240–250% ROI over three years – by reducing manual effort and accelerating cash collection.

Keep reading: See how a leading automation-focused telecom provider cut billing time by 80% with ZoneBilling

2. Chargebee

Chargebee positions itself as the "billing platform for the AI economy" – and with 891 G2 reviews averaging 4.4 stars, they've earned credibility. The platform excels at subscription automation but struggles with consistent support quality, creating a Jekyll-and-Hyde experience that frustrates growing teams.

In the Chargebee vs Recurly comparison, Chargebee’s customization flexibility and global capabilities give it the edge.

Built for: SaaS and digital subscription businesses that prioritize ease of use and broad payment gateway support over deep financial integration.

Where this platform outperforms Recurly

  • Supports 25+ payment gateways versus Recurly's limited options
  • Handles complex pricing models, including hybrid billing, without custom development
  • Provides built-in revenue recognition tools for ASC 606 compliance

Chargebee strengths:

  • Onboards in a few days

Chargebee limitations:

  • Support quality varies wildly – some users report "excellent" while others cite week-long response times
  • Critical bugs affecting billing accuracy surface regularly in reviews
  • Enterprise features locked behind expensive tiers

Chargebee pricing: Starts at $599/month for growing businesses. Enterprise plans require annual contracts starting at $75,000.

Keep reading: Understand why subscription billing is such a popular option for companies

3. Maxio

Maxio emerged from merging SaaSOptics and Chargify to create a platform built for B2B SaaS companies. It delivers the financial operations depth that Recurly lacks, particularly around revenue recognition and SaaS metrics.

Built for: B2B SaaS finance teams who need investor-grade reporting and complex billing logic without building custom solutions.

Where this platform outperforms Recurly

  • Automates complex revenue recognition scenarios Recurly can't handle
  • Provides 50+ SaaS-specific metrics out of the box
  • Integrates billing data with financial reporting for complete visibility

Maxio strengths:

  • Handles multi-element arrangements and professional services billing

Maxio limitations:

  • Higher price point excludes early-stage startups
  • Interface complexity requires dedicated admin resources
  • Custom reporting often needs a professional services engagement

Maxio pricing: Growth plans start at $599/month. Most B2B SaaS companies pay $1,500-3,000 monthly based on revenue volume.

4. Zuora

Zuora pioneered the subscription economy concept and remains the enterprise standard for complex billing scenarios. While it dwarfs Recurly in capabilities, that power comes with corresponding complexity and cost.

Built for: Large enterprises with dedicated billing operations teams and complex, global subscription requirements.

Where this platform outperforms Recurly

  • Manages billions in transaction volume without performance issues
  • Supports any billing model imaginable through configuration
  • Provides enterprise-grade security and compliance certifications

Zuora strengths:

  • Ecosystem of certified consultants and pre-built integrations (explore other Zuora competitors if enterprise complexity isn't your need)

Zuora limitations:

  • Six-figure annual contracts put it out of reach for most businesses
  • Requires months of implementation with certified consultants
  • Creates a disconnected sub-ledger requiring constant ERP reconciliation

Zuora pricing:  Enterprise pricing typically starts at $75,000 annually and scales with revenue volume.

5. Zoho Billing

Zoho Billing makes sense for businesses already invested in the Zoho ecosystem. It's the anti-Recurly – prioritizing simplicity and affordability over advanced features.

Built for: Small businesses using other Zoho applications that need basic subscription billing without complexity.

Where this platform outperforms Recurly

  • Costs 70% less for comparable functionality
  • Integrates seamlessly with Zoho CRM, Books and Analytics
  • Simpler interface reduces training to hours instead of days

Zoho Billing strengths:

  • All-in-one pricing includes hosting, support and updates

Zoho Billing limitations:

  • Limited payment gateway options compared to standalone platforms
  • Customization requires Zoho's proprietary scripting language
  • Struggles with complex B2B billing scenarios

Zoho Billing pricing: The Standard plan at $25/month handles most small business needs. Premium at $59/month adds advanced features.

6. Sage Intacct

Sage Intacct takes a different approach – it's a cloud-based ERP that includes subscription billing capabilities. This Recurly alternative is for companies that need both accounting and billing, eliminating Recurly entirely.

Built for: Growing companies that want unified financial management instead of connecting separate billing and accounting systems.

Where this platform outperforms Recurly

  • Combines GL, AP/AR and billing in one platform
  • Eliminates reconciliation between billing and accounting systems
  • Provides real-time financial reporting across all operations

Sage Intacct strengths:

  • Handles complex multi-entity consolidations natively

Sage Intacct limitations:

  • Subscription billing features are less sophisticated than dedicated platforms
  • Requires commitment to full ERP implementation
  • Higher total cost when you factor in all modules

Sage Intacct pricing: Core financials start around $15,000 annually. Adding advanced billing modules increases the cost substantially.

7. Paddle

Paddle revolutionizes billing by acting as your merchant of record. They handle all the complexities Recurly pushes to users – tax compliance, payment processing and fraud prevention.

Built for: Digital product companies selling globally who want to outsource payment operations entirely.

Where this platform outperforms Recurly

  • Provides localized checkout experiences automatically

Paddle strengths:

  • Eliminates the need for separate tax compliance solutions

Paddle limitations:

  • 5–7% transaction fees make Paddle expensive at scale
  • Less control over the customer payment methods experience
  • Some users report platform complexity despite MoR simplification

Paddle pricing: Transaction-based pricing only. No monthly fees but higher per-transaction costs than payment processing alone.

8. FastSpring

FastSpring focuses exclusively on digital commerce – software, SaaS and digital goods. They handle the entire purchase experience from storefront to fulfillment.

Built for: Software companies and digital creators who want a complete e-commerce solution, not just billing.

Where this platform outperforms Recurly

  • Provides complete digital storefront capabilities
  • Handles software licensing and fulfillment automatically
  • Manages global tax compliance without third-party tools

FastSpring strengths:

  • Simplifies international selling with built-in tax handling

FastSpring limitations:

  • Limited to digital products only
  • Customization options lag behind pure billing platforms
  • Transaction fees can erode margins on high-volume sales

FastSpring pricing: Flat-rate transaction pricing is typically 5.9% + $0.95 per transaction, with volume discounts available.

9. Salesforce Revenue Cloud

Salesforce Revenue Cloud combines CPQ, billing and revenue recognition for companies living in the Salesforce ecosystem. It's enterprise software with enterprise complexity.

Built for: Large Salesforce customers who need unified quote-to-cash processes and have the resources for extensive implementation.

Where this platform outperforms Recurly

  • Unifies the entire revenue lifecycle from quote to recognition
  • Leverages existing Salesforce data and workflows
  • Handles complex B2B scenarios like multi-year contracts with ramps

Salesforce Revenue Cloud strengths:

  • Deep integration with Sales Cloud and Service Cloud

Salesforce Revenue Cloud limitations:

  • Requires significant Salesforce expertise and consulting
  • Among the most expensive options at $200+ per user monthly
  • Complexity overwhelms smaller teams

Salesforce Revenue Cloud pricing: Starts at $200/user/month with typical implementations costing $100,000+.

10. Stripe Billing

Stripe Billing brings Stripe's developer-first philosophy to recurring billing. It's the natural choice for companies already using Stripe Payments. The Recurly vs Stripe debate often comes down to whether you prioritize developer experience or business user features.

Built for: Developer-led teams who want to build custom billing flows using best-in-class APIs and pre-built components.

Where this platform outperforms Recurly

  • Instant access to Stripe's global payment network
  • Superior API design reduces integration time by 60%
  • Real-time webhooks enable responsive billing workflows

Stripe Billing strengths:

  • Seamless integration with Stripe's broader platform

Stripe Billing limitations:

  • Business user features lag behind specialized platforms
  • Requires engineering resources for most implementations
  • Higher transaction fees impact unit economics

Stripe Billing pricing: Pay-as-you-go at 0.7% of volume or $620/month minimum for predictable pricing.

11. Billsby

Billsby earns the highest G2 score (4.8) through relentless focus on user experience and customer support. It's proof that simple billing doesn't mean simple software.

Built for: Small to mid-size subscription businesses that value ease of use and responsive support over enterprise features.

Where this platform outperforms Recurly

  • Setup measured in hours instead of weeks
  • More intuitive interface reduces training needs
  • Better customer support based on 481 reviews

Billsby strengths:

  • Free tier lets you test completely before committing

Billsby limitations:

  • Can't send payment links directly to customers
  • Limited ecosystem compared to larger platforms
  • Some users report billing errors after cancellations

Billsby pricing: Free tier available. Paid plans from $45/month (Core) to $135/month (Pro) based on features and user count.

12. SubscriptionFlow

SubscriptionFlow delivers enterprise-grade features at mid-market pricing. With fewer reviews but strong ratings, this Recurly competitor is the dark horse among subscription billing platforms.

Built for: Growing subscription businesses that need sophisticated billing automation without enterprise platform costs.

Where this platform outperforms Recurly

  • More flexible product catalog and pricing options
  • Better handling of complex billing scenarios
  • Stronger customer lifecycle management tools

SubscriptionFlow strengths:

  • Competitive pricing for growing businesses needing access to some enterprise features

SubscriptionFlow limitations:

  • Smaller user community means fewer resources
  • Mobile experience needs improvement
  • No free trial – only demos available

SubscriptionFlow pricing: Plans range from $99/month (Startup) to $249/month (Scale) based on transaction volume.

Why finance teams seek Recurly alternatives

Finance professionals abandon Recurly when manual processes start overwhelming the automation benefits. Based on 400+ user reviews and customer interviews, here's what drives the search for Recurly alternatives:

  • Billing complexity: Recurly struggles with complex B2B scenarios like multi-year contracts, usage tiers with overages or partner revenue splits. Custom billing logic requires engineering resources.
  • Automation gaps: Users report spending 15-20 hours monthly on manual reconciliation between Recurly and their ERP. Data exports, journal entries and revenue adjustments still happen in spreadsheets.
  • Scalability issues: High-volume businesses hit performance walls around 50,000 active subscriptions. Invoice generation slows, API rate limits kick in and reporting queries time out.
  • Reporting limitations: Recurly's analytics cover basic subscription metrics but lack the depth for board reporting or revenue forecasting. Finance teams export to Excel for anything beyond monthly recurring revenue (MRR) trends.
  • Support concerns: Response times average 24-48 hours for critical issues. Users describe support as "knowledgeable but overwhelmed" – especially during month-end closing periods.

What to look for in a good Recurly competitor

Smart finance teams evaluate Recurly competitors based on long-term scalability, not just immediate feature parity. The right alternative eliminates manual work while providing the flexibility to adapt as your business evolves.

1. Flexible billing options

Your billing platform should handle whatever pricing model drives revenue – without requiring custom code. Look for native support of tiered pricing, usage-based models, prepaid credits, milestone billing and hybrid combinations.

The best platforms let you change pricing mid-contract, prorate automatically and handle complex scenarios like minimum commitments with overage charges. If setting up a new pricing model requires a developer sprint, you've chosen the wrong Recurly alternative.

2. Advanced reporting

Basic subscription metrics won't cut it for board meetings or investor updates. Strong Recurly competitors deliver real-time dashboards showing revenue waterfalls, cohort analysis, churn predictions and cash flow forecasts.

More importantly – can you drill from a summary metric directly into the underlying transactions? Can you build custom financial reports without SQL knowledge? The reporting should tell your revenue story, not just display numbers.

3. Security and compliance

SOC 2 Type II certification is table stakes. But real compliance risks surface when billing lives outside your ERP – with no unified audit trail, no clear revenue rules and no way to prove who changed what. How does the platform handle revenue recognition under ASC 606? Can it generate audit trails showing every billing change with timestamps and user attribution?

For global businesses, GDPR and PCI compliance are baseline – but so is data residency and avoiding shadow databases across CRMs, billing platforms and spreadsheets. A strong Recurly alternative should simplify compliance by keeping billing and revenue recognition inside your financial system of record – not spreading risk across disconnected tools.

4. Multi-currency support

True multi-currency billing means more than accepting payments in different currencies. It requires managing exchange rates, handling currency conversion timing for revenue recognition and generating localized invoices with accurate tax calculation.

Watch for hidden complexities – like platforms that create separate customer records for each currency or require manual FX rate updates. These "solutions" turn into reconciliation nightmares.

5. Reliable customer assistance

Evaluate support based on your worst-case scenario: month-end close with a critical billing error affecting thousands of invoices. What's the guaranteed response time? Is there phone support or just email tickets? Can you escalate to senior engineers?

The best subscription billing software assigns dedicated customer success managers who understand your business. They proactively suggest optimizations and warn about potential issues before they impact operations.

Choose ZoneBilling, the #1 Recurly alternative for modern finance teams

ZoneBilling stands apart from other Recurly competitors by solving the root cause of billing and revenue complexity – disconnected systems. While Recurly forces you to manage another platform outside your ERP, ZoneBilling brings everything inside NetSuite where it belongs.

  • Native NetSuite architecture eliminates API maintenance, sync errors and reconciliation work
  • Unified financial data means your billing, revenue recognition and reporting stay perfectly aligned
  • Flexible billing engine handles any pricing model without custom development
  • Real-time visibility into revenue operations without waiting for overnight syncs
  • Scale without limits from startup to IPO on the same platform

Want to see how billing actually works in NetSuite when ZoneBilling is in control? 

Book a demo tailored to your billing model – usage, hybrid, proration or otherwise

FAQs

  • Which Recurly competitor offers better scalability for high-growth businesses?
    • ZoneBilling is built for scale – not just to process more subscriptions, but to support how your business evolves. Unlike Recurly, which begins to show performance strain around 50,000 subscriptions, ZoneBilling is a native NetSuite SuiteApp and handles millions of transactions with no API rate limits, sync delays or disconnected systems to manage.

      Lattice, a $100M+ SaaS company, scaled through rapid growth and product complexity – mid-contract changes, proration, multiple systems. Replacing their manual, multi-tool billing stack with ZoneBilling reduced billing effort by 90% and eliminated the operational bottlenecks that were holding them back. 

      As their Head of Business Systems put it: “ZoneBilling provided the scalability we needed to support our growth. Our billing system no longer constrains us.”

      Keep reading:
      See how Lattice achieved 90% increase in billing efficiency with ZoneBilling
  • What kind of businesses benefit most from switching to ZoneBilling?
    • Businesses that benefit most from switching to ZoneBilling are recurring revenue companies on NetSuite that need billing to scale with the business – not slow it down.

      They’re often outgrowing manual workarounds, juggling usage-based pricing, mid-contract changes or complex revenue recognition – and realizing their current billing setup can’t keep pace. Whether their processes are simple or deeply customized, the turning point is usually the same: billing is blocking growth, not enabling it.

      Teams spending dozens of hours a month reconciling data across tools – or stuck in spreadsheets just to keep up – see the biggest impact. After switching to ZoneBilling, Lattice cut billing workload by 90% and Sourcegraph reduced revenue recognition time by 70% – while gaining flexibility to support more complex deals and accelerate collections.

      The common thread?
      They’re done with bolt-on billing systems that break under scale – and want billing that grows with their ERP, not around it.

      Keep reading: Discover how Sourcegraph cut revenue recognition time by 70% with ZoneBilling
  • How does ZoneBilling stand out as a Recurly alternative?
    • ZoneBilling stands out as a Recurly alternative by being the only solution that truly unifies NetSuite billing and revenue management with your financial operations. 

      While Recurly operates in isolation – requiring constant data exports, manual journal entries and reconciliation work – ZoneBilling runs natively in NetSuite. This means automatic revenue recognition, real-time reporting and zero reconciliation work. It's the difference between managing two or more systems and having one source of truth.
  • What automation capabilities set ZoneBilling apart from Recurly?
    • The automation capabilities that set ZoneBilling apart from Recurly start with the complete elimination of manual data movement. Unlike Recurly, ZoneBilling automates the entire order-to-cash process – including contract changes, usage ingestion, proration, revenue recognition and reporting – all within NetSuite. 
  • How does ZoneBilling handle complex subscription models compared to Recurly?
    • Compared to Recurly, ZoneBilling handles complex subscription models by supporting unlimited pricing flexibility within NetSuite's robust framework. Need tiered usage with prepaid credits, minimum commitments and overage charges? ZoneBilling handles it natively. Want to combine subscriptions with professional services and milestone billing? No problem. 

      Recurly requires custom code for these scenarios – ZoneBilling configures them through a point-and-click setup.

      Keep reading: Scale NetSuite subscription billing with infinite configurations for contracts, subscriptions, and recurring billing
  • Does ZoneBilling provide more visibility into revenue operations than Recurly?
    • ZoneBilling provides more visibility into revenue operations than Recurly by unifying all revenue data within NetSuite's reporting engine. Instead of exporting Recurly data to spreadsheets for analysis, with ZoneBilling, you get real-time NetSuite dashboards showing billing performance, revenue recognition and cash flow – with complete drill-down to source transactions. 

      The visibility extends beyond metrics to include audit trails, approval workflows and change history that Recurly (and Recurly competitors) simply can't match.

25 minute read